Graphical user interface, text

Description automatically generated

A dog looking at the camera

Description automatically generated with low confidence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Opening Statements Presented, Witness Testimony Begins During Day 2 of Exford Trial

 

Published: March 08, 2022 at 08:00 p.m.

By: Nick Altmire

 

 

A picture containing person, indoor, person, table

Description automatically generated

Assistant Lewis County District Attorney Caleb Petzoldt (R) shows Defense Attorney John Hallett a piece of evidence for submission Tuesday during the Shawn Exford trial.

 

 

Lowville, NY- The second day of the Shawn L. Exford trial is complete, with jurors hearing opening arguments from both the prosecution and defense this morning along with the beginning of witness testimony.

 

Mr. Exford is accused of intentionally starting a fire inside the stairwell at 7525 S. State St. in Lowville on November 30, 2019, that claimed the lives of Catherine Crego and Saratina Kilbourne.

 

Things got underway shortly after 10 this morning, with presiding judge Daniel R. King taking the first 40 minutes to explain the various stages of the trial to the 9 women and 3 men of the jury so they would have a clear understanding of what is taking place. During this time the jury was familiarized with legal terms they may hear throughout the case and were given instructions on what can be considered evidence in the case.

 

“You alone determine the truthfulness and accuracy of witness testimony,” Judge King said.

 

Judge King informed the jurors that the trial formally begins with an opening statement from the prosecution, which is required by law. The defense then has the opportunity to present the jury with an opening statement but is not required to do so by law. After opening arguments, the prosecution then presents their case, Judge King explained. After the prosecution closes their case, the defense has an opportunity to present their case, if desired, but again, are not required to do so.

 

“The People must prove all elements of the crime, including that the defendant committed the crime,” Judge King told the jury. “You must find the defendant not guilty unless the evidence presented during this trial proves his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If you feel the People have satisfied their burden of proof, then you must find the defendant guilty.”

 

Judge King went on to explain that after both sides had the opportunity to present their case the trial would then move to closing arguments, also referred to as summations. Following summations the jury will then be instructed on the law for each of the 13 counts included in the indictment before being given the case for deliberation.

 

“Your conclusion of the facts is your verdict,” Judge King said. “As jurors you are being asked to make a very important decision on a member of our community.”

 

Opening Statements

 

Lewis County Assistant District Attorney Mark Lemieux started the prosecution’s opening statement around 10:45. He opened by playing a brief 911 call made by Catherine Crego on November 30, 2019, where she can be heard frantically yelling that there was a fire, screaming “we can’t get out.”

 

“Arson, murder, reckless endangerment- 8 victims, two lives cut short, an apartment building destroyed. Evidence will tell the story,” Mr. Lemieux told the jury.

 

Mr. Lemieux then went on to describe the prosecution’s version of events leading up to and around the time of the fire the evening of November 30, 2019, stating earlier in the evening Mr. Exford was at Ms. Crego’s apartment, as he had been many times, drinking and socializing throughout the night with Ms. Crego, Ms. Kilbourne, and Brian Mushtare, a resident of one of the downstairs apartments in the building. Ms. Crego’s apartment was the front apartment on the second floor of the building. Mr. Exford leaves the apartment alone shortly before midnight, exiting via the only stairwell, as the jury will see captured on security footage from a camera located across the street from the apartment building according to Mr. Lemieux, starting a fire in the hallway before exiting the building and running into a man walking his dog. Rapid growth of the fire can then be seen in the security footage, with smoke and fire pouring out just minutes after Mr. Exford left the building, Mr. Lemieux told jurors.

 

Mr. Lemieux then went on to explain each of the 13 counts included in the indictment of Mr. Exford as a result of the fire. The charges include four counts of second-degree murder (two counts each for competing theories for both fire victims) , two counts of first-degree arson, one count of second-degree arson and six counts of reckless endangerment.

 

Mr. Exford’s actions that night were “a gross deviation from the standard conduct of a reasonable person,” Mr. Lemieux told the jury, noting that the charges do not mean that Mr. Exford intended to cause death. “His actions show utter disregard for human life.”

 

Mr. Lemieux said the evidence will show that after leaving the scene of the fire that night, Mr Exford then walked back to the scene of the crime before going to a local bar where he ordered drinks. He closed by again telling the jury that the evidence will tell the story, coming in a variety of forms, including video, pictures, audio, and testimony.

 

The prosecution’s opening statement concluded around 11:10 and was followed by a ten-minute opening statement from defense attorney John Hallett.

 

Mr. Hallett opened by thanking the jury for their service and told them that the prosecution had done a good job of presenting the allegations in the indictment in an emotional manner. He reminded jurors that the prosecution must prove each element of every crime charged.

 

“You will learn that on November 29, 2019, Shawn was a 29-year-old man living in Lowville, where he had just recently moved to stay out of trouble,” Mr. Hallett told jurors. “He had a serious drinking problem and a serious addiction to drugs. His father died of a drug overdose when he {Shawn} was 15 and he then had a stepfather that beat him daily,” Mr. Hallett continued, saying that with only a 10th-grade education there were no “doors open” for Mr. Exford.

 

Mr. Hallett told the jury that the prosecution will not be able to prove how the fire started and any lapse in a chain of evidence must be considered reasonable doubt. Mr. Hallett said that Mr. Exford “thought of and treated Ms. Crego as a grandmother” and would not want to kill her.

 

Opening statements concluded around 11:20.

 

Prosecution’s Case

 

Immediately following the conclusion of the opening statements, the People opened their case by presenting their first witness. The first witness took the stand at 11:25 and was finished testifying at 11:55. An hour recess was then called for lunch, with the remaining witnesses testifying after the lunch break.

 

The first four witnesses to testify were Karen Koster, Sheldon Koster, Kelly Peters, and Shaun Koster, all residents of the upper back apartment at 7525 S. State St. who escaped the fire on the night of November 30, 2019, using the exterior staircase connected to the back of their apartment.

 

Karen Koster testified that she lived in the apartment with her husband Sheldon for over 20 years. Their son Shaun was living with them at the time of the fire, along with Shaun’s girlfriend- Ms. Peters, and their children, two of which were home the night of the fire. Shaun Koster was at work at the time of the fire.

 

All four testified to the layout of the apartment building, identifying who occupied each of the four apartments. Karen Koster testified that Mr. Exford had previously stayed in two of the apartments in the building, first in a vacant front downstairs apartment and then in Ms. Crego’s apartment, until he was told by Ms. Crego he could no longer stay there.

 

The fifth witness called, Jasyn Griffin, testified he was closing up at the Lowville American Legion that night and heard the fire siren go off and learned the location via scanner traffic. Mr. Griffin stated that he knew the Koster family and immediately ran down the street to the scene of the fire, where he assisted by carrying one of the Koster children down the back external staircase.

 

Following Mr. Griffin’s testimony a brief ten-minute recess was called, before testimony concluded for the afternoon with the final three witnesses of the day, Lowville Police Chief Randy Roggie, Sgt. Richard Knight with the Lewis County Sheriff’s Office, and Patrolman Matthew Martin with the Lowville Police Department. Each recounted the events from that night, detailing which agencies were contacted to assist as details from the scene became clearer.

 

Patrolman Martin testified that he was instructed to locate Mr. Exford that evening for a witness statement, when he observed Mr. Exford walking south on S. State St. in the early morning hours of December 1st.  Mr. Exford agreed to give a witness statement, saying he was at Ms. Crego’s apartment on the night of November 30, leaving around 11:20 p.m. to go to his apartment to get movies. When he returned with the movies he saw fire coming from the front of the building, according to the witness statement.

 

Sgt. Knight testified to the chain of custody on evidence collected from the scene and from Mr. Exford that he “hand delivered” to the New York State Police Crime Lab in Albany.

 

Testimony is set to resume in the trial at 9 a.m. on Wednesday morning.

 

When following media coverage of the trial note that the following media organizations have a reporter in the courtroom covering the trial: linkinglewiscounty.com, WWNY/7 News, and NNY360/Watertown Daily Times.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright 2021 linkinglewiscounty.com