Graphical user interface, text

Description automatically generated

A dog looking at the camera

Description automatically generated with low confidence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jury Shown Second Interrogation Video and New Surveillance Footage in Day 7 of Exford Trial

 

Published: March 15, 2022

By: Nick Altmire

 

A street at night

Description automatically generated with low confidence

Jurors were shown additional surveillance video from the State Farm building today in the Shawn L. Exford trial, showing a zoomed in view where a glow can be seen in the entryway as Mr. Exford exits the building in the center.

 

Lowville, NY- The Shawn L. Exford trial entered day 7 today, with the jury spending much of the day watching more interrogation video and new surveillance video from the night of the fatal fire on November 30, 2019, that Mr. Exford is accused of intentionally starting. Two women died in the fire, Catherine Crego and Saratina Kilbourne.

 

The trial resumed just after 9 o’clock this morning, with Jacob Byron, a New York State Police investigator that interviewed Mr. Exford on two occasions in the days following the fire still under cross-examination from his testimony yesterday.

 

When jurors left for the day on Monday, they had just completed viewing the first police interview with Mr. Exford, conducted on December 1, 2019, in its entirety. This morning opened with defense attorney John Hallett entering the second police interview of Mr. Exford, conducted on December 12, 2019, which was then played in its entirety for the jury. The video totaled just over two hours.

 

Through the course of the interrogation the investigators, Mr. Byron and his partner Timothy Dougherty, question Mr. Exford about any rumors he’s heard about the fire since they first spoke with him on December 1. They ask him to again recount the events of the evening, focusing on when he leaves the building at the time the fire can first be seen on surveillance video.

 

At one point the investigators tell Mr. Exford that they’ve heard that he wasn’t even supposed to be in the building. Mr. Exford tells them that at one point the landlord of the property “put out a list” of people not allowed in the building, but that only lasted a few weeks. He said he was on the list due to a previous altercation at the property that resulted in a police response. Mr. Exford said that Ms. Crego had even let him stay in her spare bedroom for a short time when he was having problems with his girlfriend.

 

Investigators talk with Mr. Exford about his mental health history in addition to his drug use and criminal record. They ask Mr. Exford about the drinking habits of both Ms. Crego and the person that was able to escape the fire, Brian Mushtare. He’s asked if he thinks their level of intoxication impeded their ability to escape the building. Mr. Exford agrees and responds he’s mad about that, he can’t understand why Ms. Crego wasn’t able to get out.

 

After having Mr. Exford again describe the events just prior to the fire, the investigators then change tactics. They tell Mr. Exford that their investigation leads them to believe he set the fire. “Oh my God,” Mr. Exford responds, “I wouldn’t do that.” The investigators tell him that they know the fire was there when he is in the entryway prior to leaving. “You either did it on purpose or by mistake,” they tell him.

 

Mr. Exford maintains throughout the interrogation that he never starts a fire and does not notice any fire when he leaves. The investigators tell Mr. Exford that if he started the fire accidentally they can help him. He still insists he didn’t start a fire. They ask if it started as a prank or joke, he continues to deny any knowledge of the fire starting.

 

Jurors finished watching the second interrogation video at 11:35 a.m.

 

The prosecution then called Dr. Frank Padula, supervisor of trace evidence at the New York State Police forensic investigation center in Albany, as the next witness. Mr. Padula testified that he tested Mr. Exford’s shoes and jacket for any trace of ignitable liquid residue, with none found. Mr. Padula’s testimony concluded at 11:54 a.m., with the trial taking a recess for lunch.

 

The trial resumed at 1:20 p.m., with New York State Police investigator Timothy Dougherty taking the stand. Lead prosecutor Caleb Petzoldt then entered a larger portion of the State Farm surveillance video into evidence. Jurors were previously shown the video from just before Mr. Exford is seen exiting the building at 11:43 p.m. on the night of the fire, through the time the first fire units arrive on scene.

 

In the video shown this afternoon, jurors were shown a larger portion of the video, beginning at 11 p.m. on the night of the fire, to see any “comings and goings” at the building prior to the fire. Mr. Exford is scene exiting the building at 11:12 p.m., followed about 30 seconds late by Ms. Kilbourne. At 11:19 p.m. both are seen returning after going to the Sunoco store just down the street. The next time anyone is seen leaving or entering the building is when Mr. Exford leaves at 11:43 p.m. as the fire starts.

 

Jurors were then shown a series of new surveillance videos obtained from a location a little further down the street and from surveillance cameras at the Sunoco store, showing Mr. Exford and Ms. Kilbourne walking to the Sunoco store, purchasing alcohol, and walking back to the apartment building. These videos also show Mr. Exford returning at 11:53 p.m., about ten minutes after he leaves at 11:43 p.m. to go get movies from his apartment.

 

Recess for the afternoon break was called just after 3 o’clock, with the trial resuming at 3:20 p.m. Jurors were then informed by Mr. Petzoldt that the State Farm building actually has three different camera views. Jurors were then shown a series of clips from each of the three viewpoints from the time Mr. Exford exits the building at 11:43. Mr. Dougherty testifies that the cameras had a zoom feature and jurors were then shown zoomed in clips of Mr. Exford leaving the building and the glow of the beginnings of the fire in the entrance hallway.

 

The prosecution finished with Mr. Dougherty’s testimony at 3:30 p.m. Mr. Hallett then requested some time to prepare his cross-examination. Presiding Judge Daniel R. King called a recess for the afternoon, telling jurors testimony would resume at 10 a.m. on Wednesday.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright 2021 linkinglewiscounty.com